Evidence: Gasoline Fuel Consumption & SmogTests 
Client reported, and verified consumption reduction data:
|
||||||||||
Actual fuel consumption measurements before and after installation of a Fuel-Conditioning Unit
|
||||||||||
Read metric values in color black
Read US values in color blue
|
Verified Savings in %
less use of fuel is equivalent to mileage increase
|
|||||||||
Make
|
Year
|
Odom.
km
miles
|
Used Fuel
|
City
Highway
|
tested distance km
miles
|
usage Ltr./ 100 km
MPG
w/o KA
|
usage Ltr./ 100 km
MPG
with
KA
|
saved
gas
or
increased
mileage
|
Test-date
Year
2002
|
Name
City
|
`34Niss
an
Micra
|
1997
|
32.000
20,000
|
Super
|
Highway
|
6970
4356
|
6,30
37.33
|
5,48
42.2
|
13 %
|
03. Feb.
2002
|
Reinicke
Berlstedt
|
Mercedes 1823
|
1992
|
300.000
187,500
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
3865
2415
|
24,50
9.6
|
21,56
10.8
|
12 %
|
10. Feb.
2002
|
Krostitzer Brauerei Leipzig
|
VW Golf
|
1991
|
96.523
60,327
|
Regular
|
City &
Highway
|
460
288
|
6,30
37.33
|
5,23
43.7
|
17 %
|
10. Feb.
2002
|
M. Köhler, Erfurt
|
KOM Setra Käsbohrer
|
1995
|
750.000
468,750
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
7,500
4688
|
30,00
7.84
|
26,10
8.9
|
13 %
|
8. Feb.
2002
|
Görges,
Bus Line Halle
|
TGA MAN SemiTruck
|
2001
|
170.000
106,250
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
17000
10625
|
36,00
6.6
|
32,40
7.3
|
10 %
|
09. Feb.
2002
|
Lankewitz, Leipzig
|
TGA MAN SemiTruck
|
2000
|
145.000
90,625
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
13500
8438
|
45,00
5.2
|
38,25
6.0
|
15 %
|
10. Mrz.
2002
|
Lankewitz, Leipzig
|
VW LT28 Van
|
1990
|
190.000
118,750
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
5000
3125
|
11,30
20.8
|
10,20
22.8
|
9.7 %
|
24. Nov.
2002
|
J. Grienke, Leipzig
|
Actros 1831L
|
1998
|
561.000
350,625
|
Diesel
|
City &
Highway
|
18000
11250
|
27,94
8.42
|
24,97
9.3
|
10.6 %
|
11. Nov.
2002
|
König & Neurath, Forwarder
Weißensee
|
Honda
CR-V
|
2000
|
21.000
13,125
|
Super
|
City &
Highway
|
2.640
1650
|
10,90
21.58
|
9,39
24.6
|
13.9 %
|
06. Nov.
2002
|
P. Barthel,
Naumburg
|
Suzuki
|
1998
|
N/A
|
Regular
|
City &
Highway
|
1.500
938
|
8,00
29.4
|
7,04
32.9
|
12 %
|
12.Dec.
2002
|
S. Koll
|
MAN 26 U-U
|
2000
|
274.580
171.613
|
Biodiesel
|
City &
Highway
|
9.852
6.158
|
45.46
|
41.51
|
9 %
|
23. Jan.
2003
|
Forwarder
Mittelbach, Chemnitz
|
We would appreciate a report of your savings. E-mail us here: report@economizefuel.com
USA California SMOG CHECK
Test # 1 without Fuel Conditioning Unit.
See measurements marked in red:
Test # 2 WITH Fuel Conditioning Unit.
See lowered smog values marked in red. A clear evidence that the Fuel-Conditioning-Unit
has a positive influence on the bipolar hydrocarbon molecule groups.
This is positive proof that AdvaTech's Fuel- Conditioner works as promoted
Remember: Laws of Physics are unquestionable.
A German technology design - Guaranteed for life!
Original computer print-outs below
Official German Emissions Protocol Fuel Conditioner -gasoline-
Prüfbescheinigung vom Technischen Überwachungsverein (TÜV) Prüfanlage Erfurt, vom 18.01.2001-05-30
Inspection documentation TUV-Germany Test bench Erfurt , date: 01/18/2001
als Beispiel des Ergebnisses einer erweiterten Abgasprüfung Fahrzeugtyp:
as example the results of an expanded axhaust fumes test (smog test) gasoline.
Citroen (F), 1,4 Liter, G-Kat (Katalytic converter) km-Stand: 64 133 ( 40,083 miles odometer reading)
CO-content Vol.%
|
HC-content ppm
|
||||||||||
Time
|
RPM
|
without
KA2
|
with KA2
|
Temp.
°C
|
less
pollution
|
RPM
|
without
KA2
|
with KA2
|
Temp. °C
|
Less
Pollution
|
CO
|
10.30
|
850
|
0,015
|
|
84
|
|
800
|
24
|
|
73
|
|
0,03
|
10.43
|
840
|
|
0,012
|
87
|
- 20%
|
850
|
|
19
|
85
|
- 21%
|
0,01
|
10:30
|
2270
|
0,078
|
|
84
|
|
2070
|
36
|
|
83
|
|
0,04
|
10.43
|
2260
|
|
0,016
|
87
|
- 80%
|
2210
|
|
12
|
86
|
- 67%
|
0,01
|
Master file data of TUV Erfurt (governmental agency) , Germany 
Top
Top---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "TUV" (Technical Inspection Agency) is mandatory for every motor vehicle in Germany!
The documented values are clear evidence for the high effectiveness.
Our Fuel-Conditioner will save fuel ( your money ) and the environment.
Below: TÜV Test serie - 4 sheets (originals), documenting official test results.
_____________________________ GASOLINE ______________________________
# 1 Test- Status: engine running in idle
without Fuel Conditioner
Result: emission value: High
# 2 Test- Status: engine running in driving conditions
without Fuel Conditioner
Result: emission value: High
ppm = Parts per Million
# 3 Test- Status: engine running in idle
WITH Fuel Conditioner
Result: emission value: 50% less
# 4 Test- Status: engine running in driving conditions
WITH Fuel Conditioner
Result: emission value: 50% less
Question:
Why is the hydrocarbon emission lower -
...... after installation of a Fuel Conditioner?
Answer:
Bipolar hydrocarbon molecule groups are not able to burn completely,
because in the middle of these clusters there is not enough oxygen present
to enable a complete combustion.
Our Fuel Conditioning Units recharges these molecule groups. I doing so,
the addressed molecule groups change their polarity and brake up their formation.
Now, the affinity to oxygen, and optional delivered Hydrogen is improved,
what results in a more complete, most efficient micro ignition.
Using the fuel in a most efficient way.
Now, that these molecules are burned up,
the emissions are cleaner than without the use our Fuel-Conditioning-Unit.
This improved combustion leads to less fuel consumption.
A clear evidence for a sound technology.